Case Review
Hamilton Enquiry
Whats New
How to Help

New GuestMap Guest Book.


The British Irish Rights Watch Report - The Hamilton Inquiry - The Barron Inquiry - Terms of Reference - Witness Account - Ludlow Family Account - 25th Anniversary - Profile - Questions -
Meeting the Police Ombudsman  - Ed Moloney Radio Interview - A Fresh Inquest - Press Release - Letter to  RUC Press Coverage - Barron Report is Published - Statement from Justice for the Forgotten


Press statement …for immediate release


Groups oppose proposed legislation


Joint statement from Justice for the Forgotten, Relatives for Justice and the Pat Finucane Centre 


30 November 2005


A number of groups which support victims and survivors have spoken out against the proposed NI (Offences) Bill.  Relatives For Justice, the Pat Finucane Centre and Justice for the Forgotten* have called on the Secretary of State “to go back to the drawing board and drastically rethink these proposals which show no consideration whatsoever for the rights and needs of families who have lost loved ones. This proposal is a complete non-starter. ”


The groups listed a numbers of concerns with the legislation which is intended to make special provisions for all those accused of having committed serious crimes before the signing of the Good Friday Agreement.


  • No allowance has been made for international involvement as was the case with prisoner releases, policing reform, decommissioning and the talks process;

  • No proper provision is made for the involvement of relatives;

  • Decisions on what if any information should be provided to families is discretionary;

  • The Secretary of State (SoS) will have the power to direct that all information surrounding a certificate application be withheld from relatives;

  • The SoS will have the power to direct that an individual who applies for a certificate should remain anonymous;

  • The members of the Special Appeal Tribunal and the Special Prosecutor will all be appointed by the SoS and are thus open to political interference;

  • The SoS will have sole power to appoint the certification commissioner who is thus open to political interference;

  • An applicant must supply any information or document required by the commissioner but the SoS can direct that the PSNI withhold documents and information from the same commissioner;

  • The SoS can also withhold information from the certification commissioner;


Speaking today RFJ spokesperson Mark Thompson said,


“Together these groups represent hundreds of families who have lost loved ones from as far back as 1969 and as recently as last year, from throughout the North, in the Dublin and Monaghan bombings, in the Murder Triangle and in hundreds of other individuals incidents.  We are all united in opposition to the present legislation. Let no-one be fooled; the principal beneficiary is the British state. They drew up the legislation and it is they who are pushing it through their parliament. Two principles must apply.


 The rights and needs of families must be at the core of any proposal. Relatives have a right and need to know the truth. This legislation makes no allowance whatsoever for a truth recovery process linked to certification.


The only truth recovery process that will enjoy cross-community and cross border support is one that has international involvement from the outset. The NIO, security forces, prosecution service and judiciary have been part of the problem and cannot be allowed to determine the process alone. We need respected international figures to be involved in making appointments and deciding procedures. We also need respected international figures who themselves can be appointed.”


Speaking on behalf of Justice for the Forgotten Margaret Irwin said,


“The Northern Secretary withheld documents and refused to give evidence to an  inquiry led by a former supreme court judge, Justice Barron, in this jurisdiction. In doing so the NIO showed unbelievable contempt for a senior judicial figure. How can we trust a process totally determined by the Northern Secretary and the NIO? It’s not rocket science to figure out that the NIO will use the ‘national security’ clause to close down anything that might embarrass them on the Dublin and Monaghan bombings.”


In a similar vein Paul O’Connor of the Pat Finucane Centre argued that “this legislation is a dream come true for the spooks at Vauxhall Bridge. (MI5 HQ) Had this legislation been in place in 1992 the Secretary of State could have withheld the name of Brian Nelson, directed that the RUC, FRU and MI5 withhold evidence from the prosecution and withheld all information regarding charges and eventual prosecution from the Finucane family. The NIO cannot be allowed to determine this process. It is part of the problem.


We have seen the use of Public Interest Immunity Certificates, anonymity rulings, evidence from behind screens and so called ‘national security’ in order to cover up the truth. If this legislation goes through it will have profound implications for the criminal justice and policing institutions for decades to come. A chance to deal with the past honestly and fairly will have been lost.”




Contact RFJ @ 02890 220100 [email protected] relativesforjustice.org


             PFC @ 02871 268846 [email protected]


             JFTF @ 003531 855 4300  [email protected]   


* Justice for the Forgotten represents the families of those killed and injured in the 1972 and 1973 Dublin bombings and the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings.

I Top I

Relatives for Justice  http://www.relativesforjustice.com/
Pat Finucane Centre http://www.www.patfinucanecentre.org
Justice for the Forgotten at http://www.dublinmonaghanbombings.org/


Bank of Ireland
78 Clanbrassil Street
County Louth

Account No. 70037984 

   Thank You. 

Copyright © 2005 the Ludlow family. All rights reserved.
Revised: December 02, 2005